Schedule Appointment »
317-912-1000
317-912-1000
In the realm of financial data, discerning fact from fiction requires more than just accepting numbers at face value. The manipulation of statistics and figures has become more common, making Benjamin Disraeli’s famous adage more relevant than ever: “Figures don’t lie but liars do figure.” This truth resonates when examining how financial information is presented to consumers, especially when it comes to wealth-building strategies and insurance options.
Consider some recent examples where numbers and data have been presented in misleading ways:
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) has been criticized for not accurately reflecting the inflation rate that consumers experience in their daily lives. The methodology behind this economic indicator understates the real impact of rising prices on household budgets.
The United Nations claim that global fertility rates are at replacement levels, despite mounting evidence that the worldwide population is declining more rapidly than at any point since the Middle Ages and the Black Plague—a demographic shift with profound economic implications.
Government job reports have shown discrepancies of nearly a million jobs between initial claims and later corrections, with these amendments conveniently timed to serve political narratives rather than to provide transparent economic data.
FEMA’s public declarations of being “out of money” for disaster relief were later contradicted when whistleblowers and the Office of Inspector General revealed $8.3 billion in unused, allocated funds—highlighting how even government agencies can misrepresent their financial positions.
These examples demonstrate how numbers can be manipulated to create false impressions. The way data is presented often shapes our understanding more than the actual figures themselves.
A classic illustration of how presentation affects interpretation is the “missing dollar” story:
Three men order a pizza and drinks, each paying $10 toward the bill (totaling $30). Later, the manager realizes they were overcharged by $5 and sends a busboy to return the money. The busboy, knowing $5 can’t be evenly split three ways, keeps $2 for himself and gives each man $1 back.
Now each man has paid $9, for a total of $27. The busboy kept $2. But $27 + $2 = $29. Where is the missing dollar?
The confusion arises from the misleading presentation. In reality, there is no missing dollar. The correct accounting is:
This trivial example illustrates a profound truth: how we frame financial data influences the conclusions we draw. The same set of numbers can tell different stories depending on presentation.
This principle of misleading presentation is evident in discussions about life insurance options. Common financial wisdom presents term life insurance as “cheaper” than whole life insurance. This perspective uses a narrow frame that conceals the complete financial picture.
When we remove these conceptual blinders, three truths emerge:
While term life insurance may have lower initial premiums, it becomes prohibitively expensive to maintain as you age. When evaluated over a lifetime, term insurance proves more costly than other insurance options. Most term policies never pay a death benefit because they expire or are dropped when premiums increase dramatically later in life.
Participating whole life insurance creates policyholder equity through cash value accumulation. This equity component surpasses the total premiums paid over time, neutralizing the cost of insurance coverage. Unlike term insurance, which expires without value if you outlive the term, whole life builds an asset that remains accessible throughout your lifetime.
Cash values in participating whole life insurance experience compounding growth even when used as collateral for policy loans. This characteristic creates a financial tool that allows policyholders to finance purchases and investments while maintaining growth on their money—a feature unavailable with traditional banking relationships or term insurance products.
One question that frequently arises in discussions about whole life insurance is: “How can you possibly keep more of what you spend?” This counterintuitive concept becomes clear when we examine the complete financial picture without artificial constraints.
When you spend cash directly, you permanently lose not just the principal amount but also all future interest that money could have earned—what economists call “opportunity cost.” Even at a modest 1% growth rate, this opportunity cost compounds dramatically over time. Over 40 years, this lost potential growth can amount to approximately 50% of the original expenditure.
For example, $10,000 spent today represents not just that $10,000 but potentially $14,889 after 40 years (at just 1% compound growth)—a financial loss that conventional financial planning fails to account for.
When using conventional financing for purchases, both principal and interest flow permanently away from you. A $10,000 loan at 6% interest repaid over five years will cost approximately $11,600 in total. Both the $10,000 principal and the $1,600 interest leave your financial ecosystem permanently.
Many financial advisors focus exclusively on minimizing this interest cost while ignoring the larger opportunity cost of the principal and interest leaving your control forever.
When cash value in a participating whole life policy is used as collateral for a policy loan, the financial dynamics change. Consider this scenario:
Unlike traditional financing, several advantages emerge:
In our example, over a five-year period, this approach could add approximately $14,356 to your policy’s cash value. This represents the recovery of your $10,000 principal and the $1,600 in interest payments, plus an additional $2,756 in growth.
This mathematical reality reveals why focusing solely on interest rates or purchase prices provides an incomplete picture. The ability to use a dollar more than once—maintaining its growth potential while deploying it elsewhere—creates a wealth-building mechanism that conventional financial strategies miss.
Traditional financial planning tends to compartmentalize money: dollars saved are separate from dollars spent, which are separate from dollars invested. This fragmented approach limits financial efficiency.
Participating whole life insurance offers an integrated approach where money can serve multiple functions at once. This integration allows for greater financial efficiency and higher overall returns—not because the policy itself necessarily provides the highest isolated return, but because it creates a system where money can be used more efficiently across your entire financial life.
If this approach to money management is so advantageous, why isn’t it more widely recognized?
The financial services industry is structured around product sales and asset management fees. Strategies that keep money under your control rather than under professional management reduce fee-generating opportunities for financial institutions.
Financial education typically focuses on isolated metrics like APR, ROI, and expense ratios rather than systematic efficiency across a financial lifetime. This narrow focus creates artificial blinders that prevent seeing the complete picture.
The mathematics of integrated money management requires a longer time horizon and more complex calculations than simple rate comparisons. Many consumers and financial professionals find it easier to focus on simpler, immediate metrics.
Insurance regulations and tax codes create complex environments that few financial advisors fully navigate. Many professionals specialize in investment management, tax planning, or insurance individually rather than mastering the integration of all three.
Understanding the mathematics of integrated money management through participating whole life insurance opens several strategic advantages:
By maintaining control of the use and growth of your money, you reduce dependence on financial institutions for capital needs. This control provides more stability during economic downturns when traditional credit becomes restricted.
Growth within a properly structured life insurance policy occurs tax-deferred, and policy loans can provide tax-free access to that growth. This tax efficiency enhances the mathematical advantage of this approach.
Unlike traditional retirement accounts designed to be depleted during your lifetime, participating whole life insurance creates an asset that can transfer to the next generation, extending the mathematical advantages across multiple lifetimes.
The cash value accumulation in participating whole life policies can provide a source of retirement income that doesn’t require liquidating the principal, creating more sustainable lifetime income options.
To illustrate these concepts more concretely, consider the following hypothetical but realistic scenario:
Sarah and Michael are both 35 years old and want to purchase a new $30,000 vehicle. They have three options:
If they pay cash, they permanently lose access to that $30,000 and all its future growth potential. At a modest 4% growth rate, that represents $97,832 of lost capital over 30 years.
If they use traditional financing, they’ll pay approximately $36,900 over five years ($30,000 principal plus $6,900 interest). All of this money permanently leaves their financial system.
If they use a policy loan, their $30,000 of cash value continues growing uninterrupted within the policy. They repay $36,000 over five years ($30,000 principal plus $6,000 interest). The money they pay in premiums and loan repayments remains within their financial control through the insurance company’s payment of dividends and guaranteed growth.
Over 30 years, with regular use of this financing strategy for various purchases, the difference can amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars—not because the life insurance itself produced extraordinary returns, but because it allowed Sarah and Michael to maintain growth on their capital even while using that capital for purchases.
Critics of this approach often raise several objections:
Yes, interest is still paid on policy loans. However, unlike traditional loans where principal and interest leave your financial ecosystem permanently, policy loan payments remain within your financial system through the insurance company’s obligation to pay dividends and guaranteed growth.
This argument uses a narrow time frame and ignores both the total lifetime cost of term insurance and the opportunity cost of premiums paid with no return if you outlive the policy. When evaluated over a complete financial lifetime, participating whole life proves more cost-effective.
This criticism focuses solely on rate of return while ignoring the integration benefits of participating whole life insurance. Even if other investments might produce higher isolated returns, they usually don’t provide the same liquidity, tax advantages, and ability to use money multiple times simultaneously.
While some insurance products are indeed designed for sales commissions rather than consumer benefit, properly structured participating whole life insurance from mutual companies aligns policyholder and company interests. The advantages described here work regardless of sales motives.
Removing the blinders that limit our financial perspective requires examining the complete mathematical reality of how money flows through our lives. By understanding the implications of different financial strategies—not just isolated rates and returns—we can make informed decisions that enhance our long-term financial well-being.
Participating whole life insurance is a financial system that allows more efficient use of capital throughout your lifetime. When properly structured, it creates advantages that are difficult to replicate with fragmented financial strategies.
Returning to our original question: Are we dealing with bad numbers or bad mathematicians? The answer is neither. Rather, we’re often dealing with incomplete frameworks that fail to capture the full reality of financial decisions.
The numbers themselves aren’t inherently misleading, and most financial professionals aren’t deliberately calculating incorrectly. Instead, conventional financial wisdom applies overly simplified mathematical frameworks that exclude critical variables and relationships.
By expanding our mathematical perspective to include the complete lifecycle of money—including how it can serve multiple functions at once—we gain a more accurate understanding of financial efficiency. This expanded view reveals advantages in financial strategies that conventional analysis misses.
As with our “missing dollar” example, the apparent contradiction resolves when we frame the problem correctly. Similarly, the seeming paradox of how participating whole life insurance can help you “keep more of what you spend” becomes clear when we expand our mathematical framework to include the complete financial picture.
Tomas P. McFie DC PhD
Tom McFie is the founder of McFie Insurance and co-host of the WealthTalks podcast which helps people keep more of the money they make, so they can have financial peace of mind. He has reviewed 1000s of whole life insurance policies and has practiced the Infinite Banking Concept for nearly 20 years, making him one of the foremost experts on achieving financial peace of mind. His latest book, A Biblical Guide to Personal Finance, can be purchased here.
This free binder has the information to build your own Infinite Banking system.
